Current:Home > StocksEarn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income. -Secure Growth Solutions
Earn less than $100,000 in San Francisco? Then you are considered low income.
View
Date:2025-04-15 10:32:47
Single people in San Francisco who earn less than $104,400 are considered low income, according to new government guidelines that determine who qualifies for some housing aid.
That means that some people in California who are earning above six figures — a level that's viewed as high income by many Americans — may in fact struggle to afford the basics in those regions. Other California counties where a salary of about $100,000 for a single person qualifies as low income include Marin and San Mateo counties, with the latter home to Silicon Valley.
Single workers in Los Angeles County, meanwhile, are considered low income if they earn less than $70,000, according to the new guidelines issued earlier this month by the California Department of Housing and Community Development.
The income guidelines are used to determine whether people may qualify for housing programs, including Section 8 vouchers that provide rent assistance to low-income families. It may be shocking that a six-figure earner in San Francisco could qualify for housing assistance, but the median home sale price in the city was $1.4 million in May 2023, according to Zillow.
Meanwhile, the official poverty line across the U.S. stands at $12,880 for a single person, which is a guideline used for other aid programs such as food stamps and the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
San Francisco is struggling with a host of issues, including businesses that are fleeing the city amid a rise in crime and homelessness, as well as an exodus of workers and residents as many tech companies switched to remote work during the pandemic. But despite those challenges, San Francisco remains home to many big businesses — and its real estate fetches a hefty price.
Since 2016, the threshold to be considered low income as a single worker has jumped by more than $35,000, according to the San Francisco Examiner.
- In:
- Los Angeles
- Real Estate
- California
- San Francisco
veryGood! (64758)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- E. coli outbreak: Raw cheese linked to illnesses in 4 states, FDA, CDC investigation finds
- Horoscopes Today, February 17, 2024
- The cost of U.S. citizenship is about to rise
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- NBA All-Star weekend: Mac McClung defends dunk title, Steph vs. Sabrina captivates
- ‘Oppenheimer’ aims for a record haul as stars shine at the British Academy Film Awards
- BIG unveil new renderings for NYC Freedom Plaza project possibly coming to Midtown
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Take a Look at the Original Brat Pack Then and Now, Nearly 40 Years After The Breakfast Club
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Are banks, post offices, UPS and FedEx open on Presidents Day 2024? What to know
- ¡Ay, Caramba! Here’s the Ultimate Simpsons Gift Guide
- Michael Strahan's daughter Isabella shares health update after chemo: 'Everything hurts'
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Horoscopes Today, February 17, 2024
- What does 'oomf' mean? Add the indirect term to your digital vocab.
- ‘Oppenheimer’ aims for a record haul as stars shine at the British Academy Film Awards
Recommendation
From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
George Santos sues Jimmy Kimmel, says TV host fooled him into making embarrassing videos
2 officers, 1 first responder shot and killed at the scene of a domestic call in Minnesota
Michael J. Fox Receives Standing Ovation During Appearance at 2024 BAFTAs
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
What to know about the debut of Trump's $399 golden, high-top sneakers
A suspended Pennsylvania judge charged with shooting her ex-boyfriend as he slept
Redefining old age